Go back to Flash Reviews
Go
Home
Flash Review 2, 3-2:
Less is Less
Predictable New Morris, Rote 'Prodigal' and 'Raymonda' at S.F. Ballet
By Aimée Tsao
Copyright 2001 Aimée Ts'ao
SAN FRANCISCO -- A true
Flash Review this is not. Suffering for the past two and a half
weeks from what I have jokingly dubbed the Cambodian flu (think
Khmer Rouge), I have been operating at less than half speed. Add
to it the influence of having seen both programs by Nederlands Dans
Theater 1 February 21 and 24 and you've got the strange combination
of slower faculties of perception with higher expectations for any
other dance company. This was not a great mix to take to see Program
4 on the San Francisco Ballet at the War Memorial Opera House Tuesday
night. Since I need to keep this sweet and short, I won't spend
too much time on Balanchine's "Prodigal Son," though it is hard
to believe that it was choreographed 72 years ago, or Nureyev's
"Raymonda, Act III." Let's just say that despite some very technically
proficient renderings by all the dancers, it is apparent that they
have not been coached to understand how to develop valid interpretations
of these roles. After watching NDT 1, and seeing dancers move in
a totally committed way, it is difficult to see another company
going through the motions. I go see dance because I want to be viscerally
excited by it, not so I can sit primly and say "Oh, wasn't that
nice."
The one piece I will
discuss is Mark Morris's latest creation, "A Garden," to Richard
Strauss's orchestrations and arrangements of keyboard pieces by
Francois Couperin. Morris does not disappoint in the musicality
department -- he rarely does -- but he does leave me wanting more
depth. After his "Sandpaper Ballet" from two seasons back, and his
own company's performance of "Four Saints in Three Acts," I have
to say I don't particularly care for the direction Morris seems
headed in. Where his earlier work is obviously thoroughly thought
out and crafted, the recent pieces appear inconsequential in contrast.
Yes, they are charming, and witty, and pleasing, yet something is
missing.
The high point is a trio
of men in the "Carillon" section. Christopher Stowell dances like
a dream, and the choreography suddenly gels. I should say that this
dance is generally well-constructed, not inspired, but it also becomes
predictable and that is where I lose interest. I want to be intrigued
and then led astray, to be whirled through the air and then dropped
on the floor. At the very least, let the dancers enjoy themselves
so much that we join in their pleasure.
Go
back to Flash Reviews
Go Home
|