| 
               
                |  |   
                | the 
                  New York manufacturer of fine dance apparel for women and girls. 
                  Click here to see a sample of our products and a 
                  list of web sites for purchasing. With Body Wrappers it's always performance at its best.
 
 |  Go back to Flash ReviewsFlash 
            Review 1, 7-24: In 'Court'Go Home
 A Dance Installation for an Audience of Three
  By Josephine LeaskCopyright 2003 Josephine Leask
  LONDON -- In its own 
              calm and quiet way, "Court," a duet for an audience of 
              three by London based choreographer Angela Woodhouse, is a dance 
              collaboration which challenges the status quo of dance performance. 
              Why? -- because it poses some fundamental questions about space, 
              intimacy and the audience/performer relationship, and it redefines 
              a refreshing dance/art aesthetic. Performed in an installation created 
              in collaboration with textile artist Caroline Broadhead, which consisted 
              of small rooms suggested by white layered muslin walls, "Court" 
              lasted a fleeting fifteen minutes, though it runs July 26th through 
              July31st. It was a liberating night out to see dance, as the venue 
              was the small, stylish Barrett Marsden Gallery in London, and consequently 
              free of the usual dance baggage and expectations. Also the night 
              I was there, I was joined by one other audience member so it felt 
              like an exclusive private view.
              Woodhouse directed us 
              to the two different entrances which led to the center of this muslin 
              maze and left us like a couple of children arriving at the gate 
              of the secret garden to make our own way in. First I noticed the 
              texture of the white material which was slightly patterned and slightly 
              transparent with a pinkish hue. Next my eyes were drawn to small 
              mirror glass mosaics arranged on the floor which reflected onto 
              the ceiling, like stars. In the center of the maze were some pillars 
              and some delicate chairs made out of the same material. It was a 
              mini heaven of purity and beauty, a chill out zone for the jaded 
              dance spectator.
              Walking along my corridor 
              to the center of the maze I met my dancer head on, while the other 
              member of the audience met his dancer although I could barely see 
              them through the walls. My dancer started moving her hand very slightly, 
              very slowly. Sometimes she looked at me directly. It was intense 
              and for a moment I panicked. "Should I move in response to her slow 
              gestures, should I walk away, should I stay frozen, could I touch 
              her, should I smile at her, am I a performer or an audience member?" 
              We are not used to being confronted with such intimacy in our public 
              lives. Was this public or private? Suddenly I didn't know what the 
              'rules' were any more. Issues of identity and power dissolved together 
              with the boundaries between audience and performer. We were all 
              in this together. Dance performances rarely confront us with such 
              subtle anarchy.
              What I did know was 
              that the dancer was certainly picking up on my energy and my body 
              language. I relaxed and smiled at her then we moved on. In the middle 
              of the installation, both myself and the other audience member balanced 
              the space somewhat awkwardly with the two dancers. We both felt 
              rather sweaty, dirty and just off the street in this elite white 
              Zen den. This was their space and they fitted it as perfectly as 
              their own skin. Our intimacy made every action or gesture exaggerated 
              -- every breath, every shift of weight, every glance. While the 
              dancers focused intently on their duet and on each other, they were 
              always aware of us. As we invaded their space, we also gave them 
              their cues.
              The choices which the 
              layered material walls provided were endless. You could hide, peep 
              through them, stand close to the other humans or totally in isolation. 
              There were moments when you could slip into voyeur mode and take 
              a step back into objectivity but not for long. Like a couple of 
              soothing but guiding therapists working in a spa, the white clad 
              dancers kept bringing you back into the here and now, involving 
              you in this intimate and purging experience in which time stopped 
              for fifteen minutes. From the beginning we as the audience were 
              in a state of becoming the installation as well as the performers.
              It was a tactile, subtle 
              and cathartic work and I felt like I had entered a painting or a 
              landscape rather than a dance piece. It worked well as an installation, 
              as the dancers only moved in response to their environment and made 
              clear connections between the form of their duet and the content 
              that was gently imposed by design, action and audience interaction. 
              "Court" left questions unanswered; made suggestions without 
              closure. Such conditions are fertile for dance.
               
                
              
             Go back to Flash ReviewsGo Home
 |